Požadovaná stránka nebyla nalezena

The main concern of Tobacco Control would be to give a forum for research, analysis, commentary, and debate on policies, programmes, and methods which are more likely to further the objectives of a tobacco control policy that is comprehensive. The introduction should indicate why the research reported or issues discussed are important in terms of controlling tobacco use, and the discussion section should include an analysis of how the research reported contributes to tobacco control objectives in papers submitted for review.

Documents firmly anchored to a policy that is strategic programme context are more inclined to be accepted for book. Given that log seeks to achieve a readership that is international writers must look into whether their intended submissions target problems or themes, that are probably be of great interest to scientists employed in other nations. Extremely parochial dilemmas, that incorporate few classes for tobacco control policy outside a paper’s local context, are not likely to get high priority. The manuscripts editors will generally speaking maybe not provide high priority to:

  • Studies of smoking cigarettes prevalence and its particular correlates. They are well matched to journals that are national. Few individuals residing outside a national nation have an interest in whether that nation has 30% or 35% of smokers.
  • Knowledge, attitudes, behaviour (KAB) studies of specific populace teams or health care professionals. Once more, they are better suited to national journals or even to wellness speciality that is professional. Few individuals in other nations will tend to be thinking about (for instance) whether nurses in a local medical center are thinking about helping patients quit. Nationwide studies, and people using such studies into initial areas are of more interest.
  • Reports that evoke unanimous “so what?” responses from the editors. They are documents with findings that appear to hold no apparent value for changing policy or training in tobacco control. They frequently show methodological finery, but don’t take us anywhere essential or interesting.
  • Advice pieces where in actuality the views are unoriginal, badly argued, naive or neglect for crucial ethical dilemmas in favor of sloganeering.
  • Documents that show the writers have not exposed Tobacco Control plus don’t comprehend its focus that is primary on control as opposed to on tobacco as well as its usage and health effects. We have been enthusiastic about such documents, but as long as their writers address the implications of these findings for tobacco control.
  • Papers with glaringly apparent, deadly problems that are methodological.
  • Documents on topics that need very technical or language that is discipline-specific to be comprehended by the most of visitors.
  • Documents that are replications of currently well-established findings or provide little information that is new.
  • Regional studies where in actuality the implications for the journal’s audience that is international not clear.
  • Reports written for governments or regional wellness authorities that some body thought could be offered an instant make-over and presented as a log paper.

Editorial policy

Tobacco Control adheres into the greatest criteria concerning its editorial policies on book ethics, medical misconduct, permission and peer review criteria. To look at all BMJ Journal policies please reference the BMJ Author Hub policies page.

Articles are published under a unique licence or non-exclusive licence for British Crown workers or where BMJ has agreed CC BY is applicable. The terms are as stated in accordance with our licence terms for US Federal Government officers or employees acting as part of their official duties. Writers or their employers retain copyright. Open access articles could be reused underneath the regards to the appropriate innovative Commons licence to facilitate reuse regarding the content; please relate to the Tobacco Control Author Licence when it comes to Creative that is applicable commons.

Tobacco industry funded work

Tobacco Control will likely not start thinking about for book documents work that is reporting, in entire or perhaps in component, by way of a tobacco business or tobacco industry company. Nor will the consider that is journal by writers whom accept tobacco industry capital, including money for research expenses, for several or element of any author’s income, or any other types of individual remuneration. For more information, please look at this editorial providing the thinking behind the journal’s policy. Failure to declare contending interests at distribution, or whenever a write-up is commissioned, can lead to instant rejection for the paper. In case a competing interest comes to light after book, Tobacco Control will issue a formal modification to or retraction regarding the entire paper, as appropriate.

Material previously published online

Tobacco Control is prepared to think about documents based wholly or in part on product previously posted on line. But writers must look into an editorial with this topic: Prior book on the net: brand brand brand new log policy. The editor keeps the right that is customary make modifications however you like and when required to reduce, using the approval associated with author(s), product accepted for publication. Any written or material that is illustrative is posted somewhere else must certanly be duly recognized and combined with the penned consent regarding the copyright owner (this can be the publisher as opposed to the writer).

Fast monitoring

Under unique circumstances where a paper’s findings have actually straight away policy that is relevant warranting urgent book, manuscripts are fast tracked prior to the normal queue of documents. In the event which you feel that you have actually good factors why this really is real for the paper, please information these in an customwritings employment cover letter, describing the necessity of work for the industry plus the explanation you are feeling it really is of adequate value to be managed urgently. This demand will not guarantee that the editors will agree, and just a couple of documents per year will likely be expedited about this foundation, nonetheless it can help the editors to judge the paper’s value in the present context.

Formatting, terms and revised manuscripts

Documents on electric cigarettes should utilize the term cigarettes that are‘electronic on very very very first usage, and after that the abbreviation ‘e-cigarettes’ may be utilized. Documents on other smoking distribution systems may continue steadily to utilize the word ‘electronic smoking distribution systems’ accompanied by the abbreviation ‘ENDS’ after very first use.

Whenever uploading a revised manuscript, writers must also consist of a different manuscript file highlighting the tracked changes to demonstrate the editors the distinction through the version that is previous. The monitored modifications document must certanly be uploaded as a supplementary file.

Analysis reporting gu >

BMJ calls for conformity into the following reporting instructions. Please upload the appropriate finished list for the research kind together with your distribution, and label it “Research checklist”. If no appropriate list is available for the research kind, this could be suggested in the distribution type.

CONSORT statement – necessary for all randomised managed studies
PRISMA statement – necessary for all systematic reviews
EVEREST statement – Required for many financial evaluations
STARD statement – Required for several diagnostic research papers
STROBE statement – necessary for all observational studies
SQUIRE statement – Required for several quality enhancement studies

Guidance and kinds can be found from EQUATOR.

We video that is welcome to come with accepted research articles. These enable authors to individually talk through their work beyond the limitations of the article that is formal improve the user’s understanding. Note that people will perhaps not request you to start thinking about publishing a video clip abstract until your paper happens to be accepted. Please do not attempt to upload a video clip abstract upon initial distribution of the manuscript.

There are lots of tutorials online which could guide the manufacturing of a video clip abstract, using commonly and sometimes software that is freely available. Windows film Maker and Apple iMovie would be the many examples that are common. Types of video clip abstracts can be found from The BMJ. Here are a few recommendations for making a video clip abstract. Writers might also like to ask their institution’s press/media workplace for help.

  • Movie abstracts must not stay longer than 4 moments.
  • This content while focusing of this video clip must connect straight to the scholarly study that is accepted for publication, and may perhaps perhaps not stray beyond the info. We advice itself i.e. briefly outline the background/context of the study, present your research objective, outline the methods used, present the key results and then discuss the implications of the outcomes that you follow the same structure as the paper.
  • The presentation and content of this movie must certanly be in a mode plus in terms that’ll be understandable and available to an over-all medical market. The primary language should be English, but we welcome subtitles an additional language. Please avoid jargon that’ll not be acquainted to a broad medical market, plus don’t utilize abbreviations.
  • Writers frequently talk straight into the digital digital camera and/or provide a slideshow, but we encourage the usage of other appropriate artistic and sound product (such as for instance animations, videos, nevertheless photographs, figures, infographics). Should you want to utilize product from formerly posted work or off their sources, please receive the appropriate permissions from the publisher that is relevant copyright owner.